Fiska Silvia Raden Roro


Praktek korupsi di zaman modern ini masih melukai upaya penyelesaian sengketa penanaman modal asing di Indonesia. Namun sebenarnya pada saat ini Indonesia sedang menjadi negara tujuan menarik bagi kegiatan penanaman modal asing, terutama bagi produsen barang-barang manufaktur, hal ini tidak lain disebabkan karena sumber daya alam Indonesia yang mendukung kegiatan perekonomian. Dalam tulisan ini ditujukan agar dapat memacu pengembangan sistem hukum di Indonesia terutama dalam hal penanaman modal asing dan untuk membahas mengenai bagaimana penyelesaian sengketa pada penanaman modal asing dalam kaitannya dengan Chinese Regime dan pengaruh akan budaya Cina pada metode negosiasi, mediasi, arbitrasi. Dalam penulisan ini juga dibahas mengenai upaya penyelesaian sengketa melalui litigasi, penegakan hukum dari putusan arbitrase asing serta penegakan hukum terhadap hasil keputusan pengadilan asing, dalam kaitannya dengan Chinese Regime.

Corruption activity in this modern era keeps hurting the implementation of foreign investment in Indonesia, especially for the dispute settlement aspect. Unfortunately, today, Indonesia is one of the interesting place for foreign investment destination, especially for consumer goods manufacturers. This situation happened because of Indonesia’s great resources which is totally supportive to business development activity. This article was intended to spur the development of Indonesia’s legal system, especially about foreign investment, and also to explain how the dispute resolution on foreign investment in Chinese Regime perspective, including considerations of how Chinese culture and settlement in foreign investment, methods of negotiation, mediation, arbitration. It will also be discussed how the practice of the settlement of disputes through litigation also the enforcement of foreign arbitral awards and the enforcement of a foreign court related to Chinese Regime.


metode negosiasi Cina; putusan arbitrase asing; putusan pengadilan asing; Chinese regime negotiation method; foreign arbitral awards; foreign court

Full Text:




Chen, Henry (Litong), 2009, The Enforcement of Foreign Arbitration Awards in China, The Bloomberg Law Reports, Vol. 2 No. 6, Bloomberg Finance L.P.

Cohen, The Role of Arbitration in Economic Cooperation With China, in Foreign Trade, Investment and The Law in The People’s Republic of China.

Davis, Ken, 2003, China’s FDI Policies, Breakfast Seminar OECD Washington Center.

Kennedy, Gabriela, Outsourcing to China-Risk and Benefits, Computer Law & Security Report 22, 2006.

Lee, Eric, 1985, Commercial Dispute Settlement in China, London: Lloyd’s of London Press Ltd.

Li Hu, Deputy Director of Arbitration Research Institute of China Chamber of International Commerce (CCOIC), Introduction to Commercial Arbitration in China.

Moser, Michael J., 2009, Arbitration in Asia, 2nd Edition, JurisNet, LLC.

Moser, Michael, Baker & McKenzie, 1994, The Life and Death of a Joint Venture in China, Hong Kong: Asia Law & Practice.

Nee, Owen, 2009, Shareholder Agreements & Joint Venture, Sweet & Maxwell.

Potter, Pitman B., 1995, Foreign Business Law in China, Past Progress and Future Challenges, San Francisco: The 1990 Institute.

Pryles, Michael, 2006, Dispute Resolution in Asia, Kluwer Law International.

Pryles, Michael, 2006, Dispute Resolution in Asia, Kluwer Law International.

Transactions: The Tennessee Journal of Business Law, Volume 5, Issue 1, 2003.

White III, George O., 2003, Navigating The Cultural Malaise: Foreign Direct Investment Dispute Resolution in The People’s Republic Of China, The Tennessee Journal of Business Law, Issue 1 Volume 5, Issue 1.

Ye, Ariel, 2007, Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards and Foreign Judgments in China, Defense Counsel Journal.


New York Convention on Recognition and the Enforcement of Arbitration Awards Arbitration Law of People’s Republic of China 1958.

China Civil Code.

Civil Procedure Law of The People’s Republic of China 1991.

Arbitration Law of People’s Republic of China 1994.

Other Sources:

Annual Report of Supreme People’s Court presented to the National Congress, July 2004.

Opinion on Several Issues regarding the Application of PRC Civil Procedure Law and Civil Mediation Ruling 2003 ErZhongMin Chu Zi (transliteration) No. 2.

Prevailing Party, B&T Ceramic Group s.r. 1., Italy; See Study on The Legal System and Practice of China’s Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Court Judgement, Wu Han, January 1, 2003 (www.Chinalawinfo.com).

The 2010 SIAC CEO’s Annual Report.

The report, 2010-2012 World Investment Prospects Survey, was released at the 2010 United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) World Investment Forum (WIF) in Xiamen, Fujian province.

Xinhua, China Vows to Clean Up Judiciary Corruption, 2010 http://www.chinadaily.com.cn.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30742/perspektif.v17i3.102


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2016 Perspektif

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


View My Stats

P-ISSN 1410-3648     E-ISSN 2406-7385

Perspektif by http://jurnal-perspektif.org/index.php/perspektif/index is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

Sekretariat: PERSPEKTIF
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Wijaya Kusuma Surabaya, Indonesia
Jl. Dukuh Kupang XXV No. 54 Surabaya 60225
Telp. 031- 5677577   HP. 08179392500
email: perspektif_hukum@yahoo.com