PENANGANAN SENGKETA TATA USAHA NEGARA (TUN) YANG TIDAK TERMASUK KEPUTUSAN TATA USAHA NEGARA (KTUN) OLEH PERADILAN UMUM (PU) SETELAH PENERAPAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 9 TAHUN 2004 TENTANG PTUN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30742/perspektif.v11i2.395Keywords:
Conflict TUN, Decision TUN, General CourtsAbstract
The conflict management of State Administration (TUN) does not include the decision of State Administration (KTUN) by General Court afer the implementation of the regulation number 9 by the year of 2004 could be understood through three points: first, the conflict of State Administration (TUN) which does not include the decision of State Administration (KTUN) becomes General Court’s competence; second, the conflict of State Administration (TUN) which is out of question becomes General Court’s competence; third, the conflict of the decision of State Administration which becomes State Administration Court’s competence. With those three points in mind, the problem solution should be searched from the aspects of doctrine and the aspects of decision. The aspects of doctrine would be analyzed to broaden the vision in decision making, while the aspects of decision would be the jurisprudence of the judges in decision making. Not every decision of State Administration becomes the State Administration Court’s competence. There would be some decisions of State Administration become the General Courts competence. To deal with it, the State Administration Court’s competence need to be broaden so the institution would become independent. Besides, there would be some unsuitable understanding form the law so the confirmation of the understanding would be necessary.
References
Attamimi, A. Hamid S., Peranan Keputusan Presiden Republik Indonesia Dalam Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan Negara, suatu Studi Analisis Mengenai Keputusan Presiden yang Berfungsi Pengaturan dalam Kurun Waktu Pelita 1-Pelita IV, (Disertasi), Universitas Indonesia, 1990.
Basah, Sjachran, Tiga Tulisan Tentang Hukum Armico, Bandung, 1986.
_______, Eksistensi dan Tolak Ukur Peradilan Administrasi, Alumni, Bandung, 1987.
Bruggink, J.J.H., Rechtsreflecties, Alih Bahasa oleh Arief Sidhata, Refleksi tentang Hukum, Citra, Aditya, Bandung, 1996.
Eman Suparman, Fukusmedia, UU No. 9 Tahun 2004 tentang PTUN.
F.A.M. Stroink, en J.G. Steenbeek, Inleiding in Het Staats – en administratief recht, tweede, herziene druk, Samson H.D. Tjeenk Alphen aan den Rijn, 1987 hal 26. Hal serupa juga ditemukan : N. E. Algra dan K. Van Duyvendijk, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum terjemahan J.C.T. Simorangkir,diedit, H. Boerhanoeddin Soetan Batoech, cetakan Kedua, Binacipta, Bandung 1991 hal 163 ; Sjachran Basah, Hukum Acara Pengadilan dalam Lingkuran Peradilan Administrasi, Cetakan Kedua, Rajawali Pers, Jakarta 1992 hal 5.
H.D. van Wijk en Willem Konijnenbelt, Hoofdstukken Van Administratief Recht, Uitgeverij Lemma B.V. Culemborg, 1988 hal 1. Dan Vide Philipus M. Hadjon et al. Pengantar Hukum Administrasi Indonesia, Gajah Mada University Press, 1944 hal 27.
Indroharto, Usaha Memahami Undang-Undang tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara, Buku I, Buku II, Sinar Harapan, Jakarta, 1994.
Muchsan, Beberapa Catatan tentang Hukum Administrasi Negara dan Pengadilan Administrasi Negara di Indonesia, Liberty, Yogyakarta, 1981.
Philipus M. Hadjon, Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Rakyat di Indonesia (Sebuah Studi tentang prinsip-prinsipnya, Penanganannya oleh Pengadilan dalam Lingkungan Peradilan Umum dan Pembentukan Peradilan Administrasi Negara), PT Bina Ilmu, Surabaya, 1987.
_______, Pelimpahan Tugas dan Wewenang Kepada Presiden Mandataris MPR dalam Rangka Penyuksesan dan Pengamanan Pembangunan, Yuridika, No.4-5 Tahun VI, Juli-Agustus-September-Oktober, 1991.
_______, Tentang Wewenang, dalam Majalah Yuridika, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Nomor 5 & 6 Tahun XII, 1997.
P. de Haan et al, “Bestuursrechtin de Sociale rechts staat” : Deel 1 Ontwikkeling Organisatie Instrumentarium, Kluwer-Devender 1986, hal 30 dan Philipus M.Hadjon et al. Pengantar Hukum Administrasi Indonesia, Gajah Mada University Press, 1994 hal 27-28.
Sumber,Algemene Bepalingen van Administratief Rech Rapport van De Commissie Inzake Algemene Bepalingen van Administratief Recht,Samsom H.D. Tjeenk Willink.BV.,Alphen aan den Rijn, 1984 hal 5,sebagaimanayang dikutip Ridwan, Hukum Administrasi Negara , Yogyakarta, UII Press Indonesia 2002 hal 93. (Van Galen en Van Maarseveen, 47; Philipus M.Hadjon dkk.1994:
Ten Berge, J.B.J.M., Bescherming tegewn de Overheid, Derde Druk, W.E.J. Tjenc Willink Zwolle, Netherland Institut voor Social en Economish Recht NISER, 1995.
Van Galenen Van Maarseveen, hal 47, sebagaimana dikutip oleh Philipus M. Hadjon et al. Pengantar Hukum Administrasi Indonesia, Gajah Mada University Press 1994 ha; 538.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
The Authors submitting a manuscript do so on the understanding that if accepted for publication, copyright of the article shall be assigned to jurnal PERSPEKTIF and Research Institutions and Community Service, Wijaya Kusuma Surabaya University as publisher of the journal.
