UTILIZATION OF DEBT COLLECTOR SERVICES IN DEBT SECURED WITH FIDUSIA IN PANDEMIC PERIOD AFTER THE VERDICT OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT NO. 18/PUU-XVII/2019

Fani Martiawan Kumara Putra

Abstract


Fiduciary guarantee institutions are guarantee institutions that are in great demand in Indonesia, in fact it is very possible that Fiduciary is currently the most widely used guarantee institution besides three other security institutions in Indonesia, namely Gadai, Hipotek and Hak Tanggungan. Determination when the default debtor, has its own rules, can not be interpreted arbitrarily, then in a pandemic like this, determining the default debtor certainly also needs to consider the economic conditions of many parties that decline, then it means, whether the use of debt collectors is still a matter that is worthy of attention to these two aspects. This is a normative legal research. The result of this research is that the Constitutional Court’s ruling drew many interpretations, one form of which was that the Fiduciary guarantee was no longer familiar with parate executies, and sales were underhanded, but had to go through the court. Even though the decree also emphasized default. This decision must be interpreted in full, not only related not to execute it, but also to understand about the default. Thus, will be clear what the purpose of the ruling of the constitutional court. This will also be useful for law enforcement on the civil debt relationship during this pandemic. Leasing as an institution that provides credit to the public, still requires classification rules for customers who can apply for credit. So that cases of customers who are negligent in debt payments and have problems with debt collectors do not occur.

Keywords


Fiduciary; Pandemic; Debt Collector; Constitutional Court

Full Text:

PDF

References


Legislation:

Law Number 42 of 1999 concerning Fiduciary Security.

Burgerlijk Wetbook.

The Constitutional Court No. 18/PUU-XVII/2019.

Regulation of the Minister of Finance of the Republic of Indonesia Number 130/PMK.010/2012 concerning Registration of Fiduciary Guarantees for Financing Companies.

Regulation of the Head of the National Police of the Republic of Indonesia Number 8 of 2011 concerning Securing the Execution of Fiduciary Security.

Constitutional Court Decision No. 18/PUU-XVII/2019.

Book:

Eka Astri Maerisa. (2013). Membuat Surat-Surat Bisnis dan Perjanjian. Jakarta: Transmedia Pustaka.

Herlien Budiono. (2012). Kumpulan Tulisan Hukum Perdata di Bidang Kenotariatan. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

HFA Vollmar. (1983). Pengantar Studi Hukum Perdata. Jakarta: Rajawali.

Moch. Isnaeni. (2017). Pengantar Hukum Jaminan Kebendaan. Yogyakarta: LaksBang PressIndo.

Rachmadi Usman.

Salim HS. (2004). Perkembangan Hukum Jaminan di Indonesia. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Sri Soedewi Masjchoen Sofwan. (1974). Hukum Perdata: Hukum Benda. Yogyakarta: Liberty.

Yahya Harahap. (2013). Ruang Lingkup Permasalahan Eksekusi Bidang Perdata. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Yuzrizal. (2015). Aspek Pidana dalam Undang-undang No. 42 Tahun 1999 tentang Jaminan Fidusia. Malang: Media Nusantara Creative.

Journal:

Muhammad Ikhsan Awaljon Putra. (2016). “Eksekusi Terhadap Benda Jaminan Fidusia Yang Tidak Didaftarkan Pada PT. Capella Multidana”. Jurnal JOM Fakultas Hukum, Vol. III No. 1 Riau, h. 8.

Taufiq Utomo, dkk. (2017). “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Penerima Kuasa Yang Aktanya Dicabut Sepihak Oleh Pemberi Kuasa”. Jurnal Hukum, h. 4.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30742/perspektif.v25i2.760

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2020 Perspektif

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

View My Stats

P-ISSN 1410-3648     E-ISSN 2406-7385

Perspektif by http://jurnal-perspektif.org/index.php/perspektif/index is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

Sekretariat: PERSPEKTIF
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Wijaya Kusuma Surabaya, Indonesia
Jl. Dukuh Kupang XXV No. 54 Surabaya 60225
Telp. 031- 5677577   HP. 08179392500
email: perspektif_hukum@yahoo.com