AZAS PROPORSIONALITAS SEBAGAI PERWUJUDAN DOKTRIN KEADILAN BERKONTRAK

Authors

  • Agus Yudha Hernoko Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Airlangga, Jl. Dharmawangsa Dalam Selatan, Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30742/perspektif.v12i3.285

Keywords:

Principle of proportionality- a doctrine of "fair contract”- proportionate result

Abstract

The objective of this article is to argue that the issue of equal and unequal position of the parties is irrelevant to commercial contract. The essence of commercial contract that ponders business relationship without interruption does not deal with the issue of mathematical equality; rather it emphasizes on proportional exchange of interests of the parties irrespective of result obtained by the parties.

There are three important things in this paper found. First, the principle of proportionality is applied in the entire phases of contract, i.e. in negotiation, formation, and enforcement phases. Second, the principle of proportionality is not perceived from mathematical equality perspective but it is viewed from fair exchange process and proportionate result, which is acceptable by both parties. Third, the principle of proportionality is a doctrine of "fair contract", which improves the doctrine of freedom of contract that may lead to unfairness. It is recommended in this dissertation that jurists, currently be not regard the doctrine of freedom of contract sacred; rather they shall find other philosophical basis to develop "fair contract" procedurally as well as substantively.

References

AB Massier, Marjanne Termorshuizen-Arts, Indonesische-Nedrlands Woodenboek Privaatrecht, KITLV Uitgeverij, Leiden, 2000.

Andre Ata Ujan, , Keadilan dan Demokrasi (Telaah Filsafat Politik John Rawls), Kanisius, Yogjakarta, 1999.

David Oughton, and Martin Davis, Source Book on Contract Law, 2nd Ed., Cavendish Publishing, London, 2000.

D. G. Cracknell, Obligation: Contract Law, Old Bailey Press, London, 2003.

E. Sumaryono, Etika Profesi Hukum, Kanisius, Yogyakarta, 1995.

Elmer Doonan, dan Charles Foster, Drafting, Cavendish Publishing Limited, London, 2001.

F.P.H. Prick van Wely, , Kramer's Engels Woordenboek, Gravenhage, Djakarta, 1954.

J. H. Niewenhuis, Drie Beginselen van Contractenrecht, Kluwer-Deventer, 1979.

J. van Kan, J. H. Beekhuis, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta, 1990.

J. Beatson, Anson's Law of Contract, Oxford University Pess, London, 2002.

James Penner, et. al. (editors), Introduction to Jurisprudence and Legal Theory (Commentary and Materials), Butterworths, London, 2002.

John Rawls, A Theory of Justice, Revised Edition, The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press of Cambrigde, Massachusetts, 1999.

-----------, Etika Hukum Relevansi Teoru Hukum Kodrat Thomas Aquinas, Kanisius, Yogyakarta, 2002.

K. Bertens, Pengantar Etika Bisnis, Kanisius, Yogjakarta, 2000.

L. J. van Apeldoorn, , Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, cet. xxx, Pradnya Paramita, Jakarta, 2004.

Manuel G Velasquez,., Etika Bisnis Konsep dan Kasus, (Alih bahasa Ana Purwaningsih et. al.), Andi, Yogyakarta, 2005.

Marjanne Termorshuizen, Kamus Hukum Belanda-Indonesia, Djambatan Jakarta, 1999.

N. E. Algra, - et. al., Kamus Istilah Hukum Fockema Andreae Belanda – Indonesia, Bina Cipta, Jakarta, 1983.

O. Notohamidjojo, Masalah: Keadilan, Tirta Amerta, Semarang, 1971,

P. S. Atijah, Promises, Morals and Law, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1981.

------------,, Promises, Morals and Law, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1981.

Paul Tillich, Cinta, Kekuasaan dan Keadilan, Pustaka Eureka, Surabaya, 2004.

Raymond Wacks,Jurisprudence, Blackstone Press Limited, London, 1995.

Richard J. Conviser, (Ed)., Gilbert Law Summaries Dictionary of Legal Terms, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Legal and Professional Publications, Inc., Chicago, 1984.

Downloads

Published

2007-09-19