KONTRADIKSI HUKUMAN MATI DI INDONESIA DIPANDANG DARI ASPEK HAK ASASI MANUSIA, AGAMA DAN PARA AHLI HUKUM

Authors

  • Atet Sumanto Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Wijaya Kusuma Surabaya, Jl. Dukuh Kupang XXV No. 54, Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30742/perspektif.v9i3.347

Keywords:

Death sentence, Ultimum remedium

Abstract

In pro party opinion, death sentence as the criminal sanction at ultimum remedium, still should be carried out for extreme crime, while as the opposite party the death of human being is beyond mankind rights.

References

Departemen Agama Republik Indonesia, Al-Qur’an dan Terjemahan, CV. Al Waah, Semarang, 1995.

Darwan Prints, SH, “Hukum Anak Indonesia”, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 1997.

Hasbi Ash Shiddieqy, Prof. T.M., “Pidana Mati (Dalam Syariat Islam)”, Lembaga Penerbit IAIN Sunan Kalijaga, Yogyakarta, 1974.

J.E. Sahetapy, Prof. Dr. SH., “Kapita Selekta Kriminologi”, Alumni, Bandung, 1979.

Roeslan Saleh, Prof. Mr., “Masalah Pidana Mati”, Public Relation Islam Study Club di Indonesia, Yogyakarta, 1959.

Undang-Undang Dasar 1945, Setelah Amandemen Kedua Tahun 2000, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2000.

Undang-Undang HAM – UU RI No. 39 Th. 1999 tentang Hak Asasi Manusia, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2000.

Wahyu Afandi, SH., Berbagai Masalah Hukum di Indonesia, Alumni, Bandung, 1982.

Downloads

Published

2004-07-26

Issue

Section

Articles