PUTUSAN PENGADILAN TENTANG PENYALAHGUNAAN WEWENANG DALAM TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30742/perspektif.v12i2.385Keywords:
court, unlawful act, misuse of powerAbstract
From this research, it is found out that firstly the concept of power belongs to the regime of Administrative Law To prove the element of misuse of power therefore, it is necessary apply legal concept under Administrative Law regime. In practice, however to determine whether there is an element of misuse of power court relies upon principle of reasonableness and carefulness as a parameter that are only suitable to determine materially unlawful act. Doing as such, the court mixes up two parameters of different legal regimes in determining the element of misuse of power What court does is obviously incorrect because misuse of power is always intentionally carried out. Power is given due to certain purpose. lf the power is exerted for other than its purpose, this may be deemed as misuse of power Such principle is called principle of speciality Law given power is specified bylaw On the other hand, discretionary power is general principles of good administration based on the purpose.
References
Amir Syamsuddin, et.al (Penyunting), Putusan Perkara Akbar Tanjung Analisis Yuridis Para Ahli Hukum, Pustaka Sinar Harapan, Jakarta, 2004.
E. Sikkema, Ambtelijk Corruptie in Het Strafrecht, een studie overomkoping en andere ambtsdelicten, Boom Juridische Uitgevers, Leeuwarden, 1957.
Jan Remmelink, Hukum Pidana Komentar Atas Pasal-Pasal Terpenting Dari Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Belanda dan Pidanannya Dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Indonesia, Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta, 2003.
J.E. Sahetapy (ed), Hukum Pidana, Liberty, Yogyakarta, 1995.
Mariette Kobussen, De Vrijheid Van De Overheid, W.E.J. Tjenk Willink Zwolle, 1991.
P.P. Craig Administrative Law, Fifth Edition, Sweet & Maxwell Limited, London, 2003.
P.A.F Lamintang, Dasar-dasar Hukum Pidana Indonesia, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung,1997.
Phillipus M. Hadjon, Discretionary Power dan Asas-asas Umum Pemerintahan Yang Baik (AAUPB), Paper, Disampaikan pada Seminar Nasional ”Aspek Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Dalam Kebijakan Publik Dari Tindak Pidana Korupsi,Semarang, 6-7 Mei 2004.
-------, Judicial Review of Administrative Actions and Governmental Liability in Indonesia, Dalam Yong Zhang (ed),Comparative Studies on Governmental Lialibility In East and Southeast Asia, Kluwer Law International, Great Britain,1999.
------, Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Rakyat Di Indonesia, Sebuah Studi Tentang Prinsip-prinsipnya, Penanganannya Dalam Lingkungan Peradilan Umum dan Pembentukan Peradilan Administrasi Negara, Bina Ilmu, Surabaya, 1987.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
The Authors submitting a manuscript do so on the understanding that if accepted for publication, copyright of the article shall be assigned to jurnal PERSPEKTIF and Research Institutions and Community Service, Wijaya Kusuma Surabaya University as publisher of the journal.
