KAJIAN KONSTITUSIONAL INDEPENDENSI DAN AKUNTABILITAS MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI

Authors

  • Malik Malik Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Sunan Giri Malang, Jl. Joyo Raharjo 240 A (Gedung Baru) Kotak Pos 44 Malang Dinoyo 65144 Jawa Timur

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30742/perspektif.v15i4.60

Keywords:

Independensi, Akuntabilitas, Mahkamah Konstitusi, Independency, Accountability, the Constitutional Court

Abstract

Kekuasaan kehakiman menjadi salah satu elemen terpenting dalam struktur ketatanegaraan suatu negara. Dalam konsep negara hukum, baik konsep rechtstaat, the rule of law, maupun nomokrasi Islam, kekuasaan kehakiman menjadi pilar penting tentang bagaimana negara hukum bekerja. Asumsinya, jika kinerja kekuasaan kehakiman buruk, maka akan berimplikasi bagi buruknya negara hukum Indonesia.

Judicial authority to be one of the most important element in the constitutional structure of a country. In the concept of law, whether the concept rechtstaat, the rule of law, nor nomokrasi Islam, justice becomes an important pillar of how state law works. The assumption was that if the poor performance of the judicial authorities, it will have significant implications for poor countries to Indonesian law.

References

Adji, Oemar Seno. (1993). “Kekuasaan Kehakiman di Indonesia Se Kembali ke UUD 1945,” dalam Ketatanegaraan Indone dalam Kehidupan Politik Indonesia: 30 Tahun Kembali ke UUD 1945, Jakarta: Sinar Harapan

Artz, Marjanne Termorshuizen. (2004). “The Concept of Rule of Law dalam Jentera Jurnal Hukum, Edisi 3-Tahun II, Nopember 2004

Balkin, Jack M. & Sanford Levinson. (2001). “Understanding Constitutional Revolution,” dalam Virginia Law Review V 87, No. 6, October 2001

Boulanger, Christian (2002). “Europeanisation Through Judic Activism? The Hungarian Constitutional Court’s Legitim and Hungary’s “Return to Europe,” Paper dalam Konfere “Coutours of Legitimacy” di European Studies Centre, Anthonys’s College, University of Oxford, 24-25 Mei 20 Tersedia: http://www.panyasan .de/publication/tex boulanger 2002.pdf (Dikutip 7 Juli 2009)

Currie, David P., (1998). “Separating Judicial Power,” dalam Law a Contemporary Problems, Vol. 61, No. 3, Summer 1998

Diamond, Larry, (2000). “The End of the Third Wave and the Star the Fourth,” dalam Plattner, Marc F., Joao Carlos Espada, T Democratic Invention, Baltimore: The John Hopk University Press

Ferejohn, John, Dynamic of Judicial Independence: Independence Judges, Dependent Judiciary

Fukuyama, Francis, (1992). The Wend of History and the Last Man, New York: The Free Press

Habermas, Jurgen, (1999). The Inclusion of the Other: Studies in Political Theory, Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.

________, (1996). Between Facts and Norms, Cambridge: Polity Press

Hamilton, Alexander, (2005). The Federalist No. 78, Tersedia: http:// www. constitution.org/fed/federal 78.htm. (Dikutip 7 Juli 2009)

Huntington, Samuel P., (1993). The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century, Oklahoma: University of Oklahoma Press.

————, (2000). “The Future of the Third Wave,” dalam Marc F. Plattner dan Joao Carlos Espada, The Democratic Invention, Baltimore/London: The John Hopkins University Press

Kelly, F.B. William, (2005). An Independent Judiciary: The Core of the Rule of Law, www.icclr.law. ubc.ca/Publications/Reports/An_Independant_ Judiciary.pdf (Dikutip 7 Juli 2009)

Lubet, Steven, (1998). “Judicial Dicipline and Judicial Independence,” Law and Contemporary Problems, Vol. 61, No. 3, Summer 1998

Lubis, Todung Mulya & Mas Achmad Santosa, (2000). “Regulasi Ekonomi, Sistem yang Berjalan Baik dan Lingkungan:Agenda Reformasi Hukum di Indonesia,” dalam Arief Budiman et al. (ed.), Harapan dan Kecemasan Menatap Arah Reformasi Indonesia, Yogyakarta: Bigraf Publishing

Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat RI, (2001). Risalah Rapat Komisi A ke-3 (Lanjutan) s/d ke-5 Tanggal 6 Nopember s/d 8 Nopember 2001 Masa Sidang Tahunan MPR-RI Tahun 2001 Buku Keempat Jilid 2A, Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal MPR-RI

Neumann, Franz, (1986). The Rule of Law, Heidelberg: Berg Publsihers

Sartori, Giovanni, (1987). The Theory of Democracy Revisited

See, Harold, (1998). “Comment: Judicial Selection and Decisional Independence,” Law and Contem-porary Problems, Vol. 61, No. 3, Summer 1998

Warren, Roger K., (2005). The Importance of Judicial Indepen-dence and Accountability,http:// www.ncsconline.org/WC/Publications/KIS_JudIndSpeech Script. pdf (Dikutip 7 Juli 2009).

Downloads

Published

2010-10-27