REKONSTRUKSI KEDUDUKAN AMICUS CURIAE DALAM HUKUM ACARA PIDANA DI INDONESIA: Analisis Putusan Pengadilan Negeri No. 798/Pid.B/2022/PN.Jkt.Sel.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30742/perspektif.v29i2.910Keywords:
Amicus Curiae, Hukum Acara Pidana, Asas Res Judicata Pro Veritate Habetur, Criminal Procedural Law, Principle of Res Judicata Pro Veritate HabeturAbstract
The purpose of this research is to determine the position of this foreign concept in the Indonesian legal system, specifically criminal procedural law, and to examine the existence of the amicus curiae concept in the settlement of case number 798/Pid.B/2022/PN Jkt.Sel while linking its existence in the case with the principle of res judicata pro veritate habetur, which is inherent in every decision product of an institution with the authority to adjudicate. This research was conducted in a normative juridical manner using literature or secondary data and an analytical method in the form of in-depth analysis that produces sentences according to the rules or is called qualitative. The selection of this title focuses on the position of amicus curiae itself in Indonesian criminal justice and its role in the judge’s legal considerations that result in a decision in a particular case. More or less it was found that the position of this concept is not explicitly regulated in any regulations in Indonesia, but its existence can still be found because in fact there are several regulations that indicate this concept can be used. The existence of this concept in the settlement of cases resulting in court decisions remains within the principle of res judicata pro veritate habetur, which means that it is not appropriate to doubt the decision even though it is known that there is a contribution from amicus curiae who do not have a clear position.
References
Peraturan Perundang-undangan:
Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 tentang Hukum Acara Pidana (Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1981 Nomor 76, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 3209).
Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman (Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2009 Nomor 157, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 5076).
Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2006 tentang Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban (Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2014 Nomor 293, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 5602).
Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Selatan Nomor 798/Pid.B/2022/PN Jkt.Sel.
Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Jambi Nomor 6/Pid.Sus-Anak/2018/PT JMB.
Buku:
Abdulkadir Muhammad. (2004). Hukum dan Penelitian Hukum. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Bryan A. Garner. (2004). Black’s Law Dictionary 8th Edition. USA: Thomas West.
C.S.T. Kansil. (2012). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum dan Tata Hukum Indonesia. Balai Pustaka: Jakarta.
Dio Ashar Wicaksana, dkk. 2018. Komentar Tertulis Sebagai Amicus Curiae (Sahabat Pengadilan). Jakarta: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, MaPPI-FHUI.
Judhitanne Scourfield McLauchlan. (2015). Congressional Participation as Amicus curiae Before the U.S. Supreme Court. New York: LFB Scholarly Publishing.
M. Hajar. (2015). Model-Model Pendekatan Dalam Penelitian Hukum dan Fiqh. Pekanbaru: UIN Suska Riau.
Mukhtie Fadjar. (2013). Teori-Teori Hukum Kontemporer. Malang: Setara Press.
Munir Fuady. (2007). Perbandingan Ilmu Hukum. Refika Aditama: Bandung.
P. Ramantha Aiyar. (1997). The Law Lexicon, 2nd ed. Nagpur: Wadhwa and Co.
Rahman Amin. (2019). Pengantar Hukum Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Deepublish.
Rusli Muhammad. (2017). Hukum Acara Pidana Kontemporer. Bandung: PT Citra Aditya Bakti: Bandung.
Soerjono Soekanto dan Sri Mahmudji. (2011). Penelitian Hukum Normatif, Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, h. 12.
Sudikno Mertokusumo. (2006). Penemuan Hukum Sebuah Pengantar. Yogyakarta: Liberty.
Tim Advokasi Kebebasan Beragama/Berkeyakinan. (2017). Tentang Amicus Curiae atau Pihak Terkait Yang Berkepentingan Tidak Langsung. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta
Jurnal:
Anak Agung Gde Rahmadi dan I Nyoman Budiana. (2021). “Amicus Curiae Dalam Pembuktian Perkara Pidana di Pengadilan”. Jurnal Kertha Semaya. Vol. 9 No. 2.
Linda A. Pralampita. (2020). “Keududukan Amicus Curiae Dalam Sistem Peradilan Di Indonesia.” Lex Renaissance. Vol. 5 No. 2.
Rizal Hussein Abdul Malik. (2022). “Penerapan Amicus Curiae Dalam Pemeriksaan Perkara di Pengadilan Negeri Tanggerang”. Soedirman Law Review. Vol. 4 No. 2.
Steven Kochevar. (2013). “Amici Curiae in Civil Law Jurisdictions”. The Yale Law Journal. Vol. 122 No. 6. United States: New Haven.
Sukinta. (2021). “Konsep dan Praktik Pelaksanaan Amicus curiae Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia.” Administrative Law & Governance Journal. Vol. 4 No. 1.
Website dan Lainnya:
American Airlines v. Wolens dalam Nia Juniawati Ma’ruf. (2018). “Kedudukan Amicus Curiae dalam Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Pencemaran Nama Baik di Pengadilan (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 1269/Pid.B/2009/PN.Tng.” Skripsi. Yogyakarta: Universitas Islam Indonesia.
Asep Nurobah. Newsletter Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Agung. Melalui Panitera MA. Koalisi Masyarakat Sipil Serahkan Amicus curiae. https://kepaniteraan.mahkamahagung.go.id/registry-news/1977-melalui-panitera-ma-koalisi-masyarakat-sipil-serahkan-amicus-curiae diakses pada tanggal 19 Mei 2023 pukul 19.28 WIB.
Esthi Maharani. Republika (diunggah ulang oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia dalam tautan https://www.mkri.id/index.php?page=web.Berita&id=12537). Konstitusi Sifatnya Dinamis. https://news.republika.co.id/berita/nasional/politik diakses pada tanggal 19 Mei 2023 pukul 19.08 WIB.
Institute For Criminal Justice Reform (ICJR) melalui laman kepemilikannya, https://icjr.or.id/about-us/ diakses pada tanggal 20 Agustus 2023 pukul 23.29 WIB.
Institute For Criminal Justice Reform (ICJR). ICJR: Pemidanaan Anak Korban Perkosaan di Jambi Bukan Langkah Tepat. https://icjr.or.id/icjr-pemidanaan-anak-korban-perkosaan-di-jambi-bukan-langkah-tepat/ diakses pada tanggal 24 Agustus 2023 pukul 21.08 WIB.
Reza Bagus Widiyantoro. (2022). “Peranan Amicus curiae Pada Proses Pembuktian Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana di Indonesia.” Skripsi. Semarang: Universitas Islam Sultan Agung.
Shidarta dan Petrus Lakonawa. 2018. “Res Iudicata Pro Veritate Habetur: Makna Dan Penggunaannya.” Business Law Binus. https://business-law.binus.ac.id/2018/05/20/res-iudicata-pro-veritate-habetur-v/ diakses pada tanggal 23 Agustus 2023 pukul 20.58 WIB.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
The Authors submitting a manuscript do so on the understanding that if accepted for publication, copyright of the article shall be assigned to jurnal PERSPEKTIF and Research Institutions and Community Service, Wijaya Kusuma Surabaya University as publisher of the journal.
